This article from the Journal of the American Medical Association is causing a lot of heated discussion. Here’s an excerpt:
Children who are extremely obese and in dangerously poor health should be placed in temporary foster care, a physician and a lawyer argue in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The commentary says foster care is more ethical than obesity surgery because long-term effects of the operation in children are unknown, the Associated Press reports. The JAMA article was written by David Ludwig, an obesity doctor at Children’s Hospital Boston, and by lawyer Lindsey Murtagh, a researcher at Harvard’s School of Public Health.
Murtagh told AP that foster care may be needed to protect children suffering obesity-related health problems. The goal, Ludwig said, is to educate the family to allow for reunification.
Intervention helped in the case of a 12-year-old girl who weighed 400 pounds and whose parents had physical disabilities. After a year in foster care, she lost 130 pounds and her Type 2 diabetes disappeared. In another case, a 555-pound teen placed in the home of his mother’s sister lost 200 pounds in two years.
The mother who lost custody of her son, Jerri Gray of Greenville, S.C., told AP she was glad the youth had lost weight, but “they’ve done damage by pulling us apart.”
Should obese children be taken away from their parents? Weigh in…
2 comments
Elaine says:
Jul 13, 2011
No, the cost of removing the child would be better served spend in the home along with the entire family on education, nutrition and exercise.
Mr.Knowitall says:
Jul 14, 2011
i believe temperary foster care to make the child healthy again is a good thing along with pressing charges on the parents. its harsh i know but it will bring people to reality and say hey maybe i shouldnt let my children get that unhealthy. and by pressing charges they lose money and that is a harsh effect on a home that people can not afford, so they with think twice the next time around